Filed under: News | Hardware & Peripherals
Sep 27 2006, 1:00pm CDT | by Shane McGlaun
However, from what I hear it seems that this move by Intel may be a repeat of the first to dual core war that played out when the dual core parts first hit market. Namely Intel won the bragging rights by getting their dual core part to market first. However, to do so they had an inferior CPU design that didn’t allow the two cores to talk directly.What Intel did was basically put two separate cores inside the processor and have them talk via the FSB. Whereas AMD took its time with their last to market dual core CPU, but thoroughly trashed Intel when it came to performance thanks to their much more efficient direct connection for the two cores to communicate over.
Like this story, share it with millions of investors on M3 Like this story, share it with millions of investors on M3 The Information Technology sector has a special significance for India, because Indias competence in this sector has made it a net expor ...
Full article at: Moneycontrol.com
More like this 1 day ago, 1:25am CST
In this Product How-To article Mark Saunders describes a new methodology for doing firmware development for the Cypress’ Arm-based Programmable SoCs, using the company’s PSoC Creator in combination with Arm’s uVision IDE. Programmable devices are really ...
Full article at: My ESM
More like this 6 days ago, 3:45pm CST
Shane McGlaun
Leading our review center, Shane knows technology inside out. His
extensive experience in testing computer hardware and consumer
electronics enable him to effectively qualify new products and trends. If you want us review your product, please contact Shane.
Shane can be contacted directly at shane@i4u.com.
blog comments powered by Disqus Comments