Latest News: Technology |  Celebrity |  Movies |  Apple |  Cars |  Business |  Sports |  TV Shows |  Geek


Filed under: News


Tax Break Ending For Underwater Homeowners: Is It The Right Time?

Dec 27 2013, 11:16am CST | by

10 Updates
Tax Break Ending For Underwater Homeowners: Is It The Right Time?
Photo Credit: Forbes


Full Story

Tax Break Ending For Underwater Homeowners: Is It The Right Time?

Here’s a startling statistic: the number of homeowners who owe more on their mortgage than their home is worth is greater than the number of residents in most states.

According to the latest report from Zillow, nearly 11 million homeowners have negative equity in their homes, or are considered underwater. That’s more than the population of 43 of our states: only California, Texas, New York, Florida, Illinois, Pennsylvania and Ohio can boast census numbers larger than that figure. The rate works out to about in five homeowners with a mortgage (if you add in those homeowners with 20% or less equity in their homes, called the “effective” negative equity rate, that number doubles to two in five homeowners). By the dollars, homeowners in the U.S. were underwater by $805 billion as of the end of third quarter of 2013.

The good news is that number is shrinking. Last year at this time, nearly one in three homeowners with a mortgage were underwater. The dip seems to indicate that the housing market is continuing to recover – or correcting, depending on who you ask – from the subprime mortgage crisis in 2007.

That crisis, which either contributed to or resulted from the 2007 recession (again, depending on who you ask), burst the housing bubble, sending many homeowners scrambling to unload properties. With a glut of overpriced homes on the market, real estate was slow to move, making sales difficult and often painful for homeowners. Sometimes, the result was renegotiated mortgage or a short sale. Other times, homeowners simply walked away with no home but also no debt. Only there was a bit of a catch. For federal income tax purposes, once a lender writes off any part of your debt – even a mortgage – that amount which is forgiven is reported to the Internal Revenue Service on a form 1099-C. That amount may be includable as income. The result? No money. Possibly no home. And potentially serious tax debt.

To try and stop the bleeding, Congress passed the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act in 2007. The Act, which offered an exception to the debt as taxable income rule for qualifying homeowners, was signed into law by President George W. Bush at the year end. It was intended to be retroactive, beginning with January 1, 2007, and applied to mortgages discharged through December 31, 2009. But recovery didn’t come quickly enough so the Act was extended in 2008 for another three years, through December 31, 2012. And when recovery still didn’t come quickly enough, the Act was extended through December 31, 2013.

The exception has now been law for seven full calendar years. It’s set to expire in four days unless Congress grants yet another extension. As of this writing, that hasn’t happened.

There are, however, three bills in Congress right now that would extend the Act yet again. The Senate’s version of the bill, S. 1187, sponsored by Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) would add another band-aid to the wound, extending relief one more year. That bill has been referred to the Committee on Finance, where it has remained since June 19, 2013. Both House versions of the bill would also extend the Act for one more year. Similarly, both versions remain in committee.

The question of what to do with the Act is not easily addressed.

From a revenue perspective, one argument against extending the Act is that it depresses revenues by exempting otherwise taxable income from collections. Critics argue the lost revenue argument is flawed since those who can’t afford to pay their mortgage would not be able to pay the tax on the debt forgiveness.

Housing advocates argue that not extending the Act is simply bad policy, punishing those already facing serious financial difficulties and pushing off a potential recovery in the housing market. Others question whether any such recovery is going to happen, suggesting that the market simply “right-sizing.” It has, after all, been seven years since the law went into effect and while the numbers of underwater homeowners are falling, they are not falling quickly enough to make a significant difference.

I’m not a fan of extending the Act. My objection isn’t so much a revenue issue, nor is it a housing advocacy or market issue, but rather a tax policy note. I agree that it isn’t sensible to ask strapped taxpayers to pay up on what is essentially phantom income. But Congress had already anticipated this concern in years prior, just not restricted to home ownership. Under existing tax law – even without the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act – there is an insolvency exclusion. Under the exclusion, if you are insolvent when your debt is cancelled, some or all of the cancelled debt may not be taxable to you. You’re considered insolvent when your total debts are more than the fair market value of your total assets.

I get that “total debts” and “total assets” aren’t necessarily restricted to mortgages and home ownership. But the underlying theme – that you shouldn’t be forced to pay taxes when you can’t pay your other debts – is the same, no matter what kind of debt. And, in fact, before 2007, taxpayers who found themselves underwater (and yes, it did happen before 2007), relied on the insolvency exclusion for protection when applicable: you can still opt to claim the insolvency exclusion on a mortgage when you don’t meet the criteria for the mortgage exclusion. The same insolvency rule applies to the discharge of other debts, too, like car loans, student loans and credit cards.

But let’s say that we decide that homeowners should be, as a matter of policy, protected from paying tax on the cancellation of mortgage debt even when the insolvency exclusion doesn’t apply. If that’s true, why keep putting a band-aid on it? Why stop with one year? Why not five years? Or ten years? Why not make it a permanent exclusion? At what point is constantly extending the Act by one year increments just more than a bit silly?

I agree that we’re not out of the woods in the housing crisis. Or the jobs crisis. Or the student loan crisis. The economy is clearly not fully recovered (despite what is apparently a healthy day on Wall Street today). But it seems to me, however, that our current tax policy isn’t helping us out of the crisis. We need long-term solutions, not last minute throw togethers.

Want more taxgirl goodness? Pick your poison: You can receive posts by email, follow me on twitter (@taxgirl) hang out with me on Facebook and check out my YouTube channel. You can also subscribe to the podcast on the site or via iTunes (it’s free).

Source: Forbes


iPad Air Giveaway. Win a free iPad Air.

You Might Also Like


Sponsored Update

Update: 10

4 Firms In Iskandar Malaysia Get Facilitation Fund Totalling RM16.2 Million

Source: Malaysia Today

(Bernama) – Four companies have received the facilitation fund amounting to RM16.2 million from TERAJU@Iskandar Malaysia in an information sharing programme on business opportunities and assistance for the sm ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today 1 week ago, 7:42am CDT


Update: 9

Selangor’s Watergate about to explode

Source: Malaysia Today

Anwar brought Wan Azmi to meet Khalid to try to resolve this matter. Anwar supports the RM2.5 billion claim but Khalid is stubbornly sticking to the figure ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today Jul 23 2014, 4:12am CDT

More From the Web

Update: 8

GLCs told to provide RM7 billion to develop Bumiputera firms

Source: Malaysia Today

(The Malaysian Insider) – Putrajaya has directed government-linked companies (GLC) to generate RM7 billion in business opportunities for Bumiputera firms this year, Prime Minister Prime Mini ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today Jul 17 2014, 2:05am CDT

Update: 7

Rafizi shows proof of Putrajaya’s hand in contentious carpet-trader loan

Source: Malaysia Today

Eileen Ng, The Malaysian Insider PKR lawmaker Rafizi Ramli today revealed documents to prove Putrajaya interfered in the RM32 million Bank Rakyat loan to ‎controversial businessman Deepak Jaikishan. Rafizi ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today Jul 16 2014, 2:16am CDT

Update: 6

PAS MP claims Bank Rakyat loaned carpet-trader RM215m, interest free

Source: Malaysia Today

(Malay Mail Online) – Controversial businessman Deepak Jaikishan (pic) was given a whopping RM215 million interest-free loan from state-owned Bank Rakyat, a PAS lawmaker alleged today, despite Putrajaya’s claims otherwise. ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today Jul 14 2014, 5:52am CDT

Update: 5

MRCB, Nusa Gapurna and PKNS settle suit over RM3 billion PJ Sentral project

Source: Malaysia Today

(The Malaysian Insider) – Malaysian Resources Corp Bhd (MRCB), Nusa Gapurna Development Sdn Bhd (NGD) and PKNS Holdings Sdn Bhd have reached an out-of-court settlement ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today Jun 21 2014, 2:53am CDT

Update: 4

Story behind Syed Mokhtar’s ‘RM2.25 billion tax-exempt’ Bernas deal revealed, says PKR MP

Source: Malaysia Today

(The Malaysian Insider) – An innocuous written reply in Parliament has provided a peek into the cosy relationship between the Najib administration and Malaysia’s best-known busine ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today Jun 15 2014, 12:56pm CDT

Update: 3

Constitutional monarchy still murky concept

Source: Malaysia Today

After the RM4.5 billion land sale, the Sultan of Johor secured a 15% stake in MOL Access Portal (MOL) for RM396 million and took a 20% stake in Berjaya Times... RE ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today Jun 14 2014, 12:37am CDT

Update: 2

Sultan of Johor’s RM4.5 bil backlash?

Source: Malaysia Today

Has Sultan Ibrahim of Johor’s succession of big money deals over the last six months caused the tide of public opinion to turn against Johor’s royal palace? KiniBiz examines the... READ MORE ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today Jun 11 2014, 8:49am CDT

Update: 1

Putrajaya denies carpet dealer given interest-free loan

Source: Malaysia Today

Eileen Ng, The Malaysian Insider Putrajaya today refuted allegations that Bank Rakyat had allowed carpet dealer Deepak Jaikishan to repay a RM32 million loan without interest following inte ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today Jun 11 2014, 5:44am CDT

Shopping Deals


<a href="/latest_stories/all/all/31" rel="author">Forbes</a>
Forbes is among the most trusted resources for the world's business and investment leaders, providing them the uncompromising commentary, concise analysis, relevant tools and real-time reporting they need to succeed at work, profit from investing and have fun with the rewards of winning.




blog comments powered by Disqus

Latest stories

Sharknado 2: Death, Cameos, and Twitter
Sharknado 2: Death, Cameos, and Twitter
Sharknado raked in nearly a billion conversations and mentions on Twitter-in part because celebrities showed up everywhere.
Jada Pinkett Smith Opens Up About Her Marriage
Jada Pinkett Smith Opens Up About Her Marriage
The Actress Also Talks About Her New Role in This Falls "Gotham" TV Show.
Trending Now: Allison Williams, Sharknado 2 and Kate Upton
Trending Now: Allison Williams, Sharknado 2 and Kate Upton
Find below the top 3 trending news stories to start your day.
T-Mobile adds 1.5 million Subscriber in Q2
T-Mobile adds 1.5 million Subscriber in Q2
T-Mobile USA is on a wild run. The carrier added 1.5 million new customers in the last quarter.

About the Geek Mind

The “geek mind” is concerned with more than just the latest iPhone rumors, or which company will win the gaming console wars. I4U is concerned with more than just the latest photo shoot or other celebrity gossip.

The “geek mind” is concerned with life, in all its different forms and facets. The geek mind wants to know about societal and financial issues, both abroad and at home. If a Fortune 500 decides to raise their minimum wage, or any high priority news, the geek mind wants to know. The geek mind wants to know the top teams in the National Football League, or who’s likely to win the NBA Finals this coming year. The geek mind wants to know who the hottest new models are, or whether the newest blockbuster movie is worth seeing. The geek mind wants to know. The geek mind wants—needs—knowledge.

Read more about The Geek Mind.