As parents and grandparents have joined the ranks of Facebook’s most active users, the site’s bread and butter — the teenage and Millennial sets — have increasingly turned their attention to sites like Snapchat, Vine and Twitter. After all, when dorky Uncle Larry starts “liking” all your pictures, what used to feel cool can suddenly feel passe. But according to one analyst from SunTrust, Facebook’s dwindling cool factor is hardly anything for investors to worry about.
Don't Miss: MWC 2017 Highlights
In a research note released Monday morning, SunTrust analyst Robert Peck took a bullish stance on the company, reiterating Facebook’s “buy” rating and raising its 2014 price target from $55 per share to $65 per share. Peck also revised Facebook’s fourth quarter earnings estimate, adjusting its expected revenue to $2.37 billion, up from $2.29 billion. Facebook said Monday that it will release its fourth quarter earnings after the market closes on January 29.
Peck said his bullish outlook is driven by five factors, including the monetization of Instagram, a better ad quality and the integration of mobile ads. As for claims that teens aren’t using the site? Peck sees less of a Myspace comparison than Google and Amazon analogies.
“[M]uch like how Google and Amazon aren’t necessarily considered “cool” anymore, teens and older people still use those platforms due to their utility,” he said, noting that because users share “life events” on Facebook there is an air of permanence and a true community platform. “Will teens begin to use it more as community matters more once they separate from friends physically? As long as Facebook continues to innovate and invest in new functionality, we see no reason why they wouldn’t.”
A recent Pew study found that 63% of adults visit Facebook on a daily basis, and 40% of that group visits the site multiple times a day. Peck said that this type of activity level lends further credence to the idea that Facebook is a utility and not just a hot trend. Furthermore, he said, the number of users visiting Instagram on a monthly basis (150 million as of Facebook’s third quarter earnings report) could translate into significant amounts of money.
“Assuming Facebook shows 2 ads per visit, we calculated ~63 billion total impressions the company could sell in 2014. At an effective [cost per impression] of $2.50, we calculate over $150 million of incremental revenue in 2014, growing to almost $700 million in 2017,” Peck wrote.
Indeed, results from an early trial of Instagram ads were positive: Ben & Jerry’s reached 9.8 million 18 to 34 year-olds in 8 days, while an Instagram Levi’s ad reached 7.4 million 18 to 34 year-olds over the course of 9 days. Control groups for both ads revealed double-digit increases in brand recall.
For its near-term, fourth-quarter revenue prediction, Peck said that the $2.4 billion revenue estimate is split between payment revenues of $242 million (which would mark a 5% year-over-year decline) and ad revenues of $2.13 billion, a 60% year-over-year increase. While the accuracy of Peck’s prediction will come to light when Facebook reports its fourth quarter results on the 29th, Peck’s recent track record is pretty good: he was the first to set a public price target for Twitter, setting a bullish $50 per share target when the company itself said shares were worth a little over $20 a pop. Today, Twitter is trading for $64.72 per share, a 53.7% gain since its November 7, 2013 stock market debut.
Following the release of Peck’s report, shares of Facebook were up 2.3% in Monday morning trading. The stock finished 2013 with 95.2% growth.