Clone of Alibaba (BABA) IPO Shares Jump 36%

Alibaba (BABA) IPO Shares Jump 36%

The Sexiest Halloween Costumes of 2014

The Sexiest Halloween Costumes of 2014

Mazda Miata 2016 model revealed

Mazda Miata 2016 model revealed

Miley Cyrus New Butt Gets in Trouble with Law

Miley Cyrus New Butt Gets in Trouble with Law

Larry Ellison Steps Down as CEO of Oracle

Larry Ellison Steps Down as CEO of Oracle

Technology: Training our Work Force to Keep Up and Adapt

Feb 7 2014, 11:10pm CST | by , in News | Technology News

Technology: Training our Work Force to Keep Up and Adapt

YouTube Videos Comments

Full Story

Technology: Training our Work Force to Keep Up and Adapt

There used to be a popular cartoon with a caption that said, “To err is human, to really foul things up requires a computer.”  Technology back then was very tightly engineered to do specific, rote operations and if you went outside that box, you were asking for trouble.

But computing has changed a lot over the years and we’ve come to expect more.  Big data, machine learning and cognitive computing have transformed our devices into helpful companions, able to adapt to our particular context and solve complex problems.

Unfortunately, our organizations haven’t kept pace.  The computing elements—also known as people—are organized by strict job descriptions and performance is measured in those terms.  That worked fine when markets were stable, but in our present age of disruption, it often spells disaster.  Clearly, we need to change the software in our organizations.

Data Driven To Oblivion

Some years ago, I was called in to help a prestigious consultancy with a restructuring project.  In consultant-speak, restructuring is a euphemism for a last ditch attempt to save a company that has gone very wrong and is now at death’s door.  They wanted my input on cutting marketing costs.

When I arrived the twenty-three year old in charge helpfully explained to me that he wanted to increase sales and didn’t want and touchy-feely branding ideas.  He showed me the media plan and asked where we could trim non-essential spending.  “Why don’t you cut the prices in half?” I asked.

The confused look he gave me was priceless.  He had been working on the project for a week or so and as a talented spreadsheet jockey, he knew the financials backwards and forwards.  What he didn’t do was pick up the phone and check rates, which were roughly double what they should have been.

The consultancy in question was prestigious for a reason, they were very good at what they did and had saved a number of firms from sure ruin.  They just weren’t engineered to work in the rough and tumble world of media trading.  What was simple from my perspective, just didn’t compute in their organizational software.

Programming For Jobs Instead Of Function

In their book, Creative Confidence, IDEO’s David and Tom Kelley tell the story of Doug Dietz, an engineer who has spent his career designing medical imaging systems for General Electric. Some years ago, he won a prestigious design award for a new MRI machine and he was excited to go to a hospital and see it in action.

Yet, when he got to the pediatric ward, it wasn’t pride he felt, but horror.  The sleek, multimillion dollar piece of machinery caused so much terror in children that as many as 80% of pediatric patients needed to be sedated.  He had done a great job of designing for the needs of doctors and hospitals, but the patients themselves never entered his mind.

Taking this new insight into account, he went back to the drawing board and created a new adventure series of MRI machines.  Now, instead of being herded into a scary machine, kids are immersed into a story, like a pirate ship or space adventure, complete with a script for machine operators and a treasure at the end.

What Dietz did was much more than change specifications, he reimagined the purpose of his work. That’s the difference between performing a function and doing a job.  Jobs change, functions don’t.  The world has become an unforgiving place and we can no longer afford to think in terms of functions.  We must adapt.

The Power Of The Pivot

A fundamental tenet of corporate strategy has been planning.  You research the plan, formulate the plan and then execute the plan.  Plans come from the top and those below are supposed to fall in line, play their role and not ask too many questions.  They will be evaluated and compensated by how well they perform their particular function.

Yet as innovation researcher Tim Kastelle points out, traditional top down analysis usually fails in new environments and as fast as things change today, nobody has the luxury of playing the same old game anymore.  The reality is that, as this HBR article puts it, business plans rarely survive first contact with customers.

That’s why the lean startup movement is gaining steam even for large corporations like GE, Qualcomm and Intuit.  Steve Blank, who pioneered the approach, emphasizes the importance of the pivot.  No matter how much effort you put into researching the opportunity, at least one of your key assumptions will be wrong and you’ll have to adjust.

It should be clear by now that the plan-develop-execute model no longer works.  Today, you have to develop a minimally viable product, put it in front of customers, continually evaluate its performance and constantly iterate new solutions.  Very few organizations today are set up to do that.

Less Mozart and More Jazz

The modern corporation works very much like an orchestra.  Leadership’s function is to guide a diverse set of functional units through a predetermined program.  If someone starts playing out of tune, they must be brought back into line or eliminated.  That’s how we train, evaluate and reward people, so that’s how they perform.

The problem, of course, is that the real world doesn’t work like that.  We frequently encounter problems that lie beyond our job description.  When that happens, we go to a guy down the hall and hope that he has been programmed for that particular function.  If not, the problem doesn’t get solved.  This is a very silly way to operate.

We need to start managing less like an orchestra and more like a jazz ensemble, where we prepare rather than plan, improvisation is encouraged rather than penalized and failure is expected rather than condemned.

The New Talent Paradigm

People are different than other resources because they are, hopefully, intelligent.  They can dream, adapt and learn new skills.  There are, in truth, very few jobs that are so complex that they can’t be learned in six months and mastered in two years.  So why are people still expected to spend 20 or 30 years doing the same job in the same industry?

Unfortunately, we still treat people as functional units.  We go to great lengths to prepare detailed job specifications, train them only for skills directly related to those specifications and, when they need to be replaced, look for a functional equivalent.  We replace the cog and expect the machine to keep running.

The reality is that we need to start doing the opposite.  Pushing people to do jobs that they are not qualified for, getting them to stretch and hiring new employees that aren’t a perfect fit, but will challenge the enterprise.  We are in a new era of talent and can’t assume that the skills we needed last year are the ones we’ll need next year.

In the last decade, we’ve seen a revolution in technology.  It’s become intelligent, adaptive and scalable.  Shouldn’t we expect the same from our organizations?

Source: Forbes


You Might Also Like


Sponsored Update


More From the Web

Shopping Deals


<a href="/latest_stories/all/all/31" rel="author">Forbes</a>
Forbes is among the most trusted resources for the world's business and investment leaders, providing them the uncompromising commentary, concise analysis, relevant tools and real-time reporting they need to succeed at work, profit from investing and have fun with the rewards of winning.




blog comments powered by Disqus

Latest stories

Nicki Minaj: A Fair Warning to Male Drivers…Dangerous Curves Ahead!
Nicki Minaj: A Fair Warning to Male Drivers…Dangerous Curves Ahead!
The Voluptuous Black Mama with Vim and Vigor and Vociferous Vibes!
Sears Black Friday
Sears Black Friday
When it comes to department stores, there are very few companies that can compete with someone like Sears. They have home appliances, clothing, power tools, and everything in between. For people who are shopping for...
Facebook&#039;s out to copy Twitter news feeds
Facebook's out to copy Twitter news feeds
Facebook faced an oops when the site belatedly joined in the Ferguson coverage. Now the site's looking to compete with microblogging site Twitter.
Queen Latifah on community and domestic violence
Queen Latifah on community and domestic violence
Queen Latifah's active in community outreach and involvement. At the start of The Queen Latifah Show's second season, the host is opening up on how to be a better member of society.

About the Geek Mind

The “geek mind” is concerned with more than just the latest iPhone rumors, or which company will win the gaming console wars. I4U is concerned with more than just the latest photo shoot or other celebrity gossip.

The “geek mind” is concerned with life, in all its different forms and facets. The geek mind wants to know about societal and financial issues, both abroad and at home. If a Fortune 500 decides to raise their minimum wage, or any high priority news, the geek mind wants to know. The geek mind wants to know the top teams in the National Football League, or who’s likely to win the NBA Finals this coming year. The geek mind wants to know who the hottest new models are, or whether the newest blockbuster movie is worth seeing. The geek mind wants to know. The geek mind wants—needs—knowledge.

Read more about The Geek Mind.