Apple's Tim Cook denied plans for a smaller iPhone dubbed in the Apple rumor world as iPhone nano.
Apple's COO Tim Cook who currently runs Apple until Steve Jobs is back got it though very wrong on what an iPhone nano smartphone is.
According to Apple Insider, when asked about an iPhone nano he replied "We're not going to play in the low-end voice phone business". That is not what I think an iPhone nano should be. I want a full iPhone 3G that is just a little smaller sporting an 2.2-2.6 inch OLED with QVGA resolution. Using an OLED screen should help with the battery.
An iPod nano should be able to do everything that the iPod can do these days. Where is this idea coming from that an iPhone nano would be a stripped down iPhone?
More iPhone nano related news.
Don't Miss: Find a Nintendo Switch in stock online