Latest News: Technology |  Celebrity |  Movies |  Apple |  Cars |  Business |  Sports |  TV Shows |  Geek

Trending

Filed under: News | Other Stuff

 

Answers to Why the Trilobite Vacuum Robot is Expensive

Jun 1 2004, 1:04pm EST | by

10 Updates
Answers to Why the Trilobite Vacuum Robot is Expensive
 
 

Comments

Recommend Your Tweet as Top Tweet:

Full Story

Answers to Why the Trilobite Vacuum Robot is Expensive

Trilobite 2.0 When we reported about the new Electrolux Trilobite 2.0 Vacuum robot last Friday, we asked the question why this vacuum robot ($1,799 at Amazon.com ) is about 10 times more expensive than the iRobot Roomba ($159.99 at amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00008439Y/ref=nosim/i4ufututechne-20?dev-t=D1KQJBNTALRLQH">Amazon.com ) .

We got several great answers and first hand experience reports emailed from I4U readers. Below I posted the most interesting ones. Thanks to everybody who sent in his opinion, we are very happy about the great response we got.

Mattias Bengtsson brings it to the point best by writing:
"I have both vaccum cleaners. The Trilobit is superior to the Roomba in every respect. It's like a Trabant versus a Rolls ."

Brian Summers provides a very in-depth analyses on the sensor technology differences. 
Excerpt:"The main difference in price most likely has to do with the different sensors and mapping techniques that the robots implement. Truth be told the Roomba is really a "dumb" robot which only reacts to situations (i.e. when it bumps into something or detects a IR beam). It will then just randomly turn in another direction." read below his full report.


Buy the target="_top">Electrolux Trilobite® High Performance Robotic Vac at Hammacher Schlemmer for $1,799.95.





roomba versus trilobite irobot roomba vacuum robot compared to electrolux trilobite 1.0 trilobite 2.0 Future Tech Gadget Gift geek cool gadget Product Technology Future Cool smallest, Buy Gift Sale Electronics device camera player new gadget future gadget Future Technology News technology Review Roomba















roomba versus trilobite irobot roomba vacuum robot compared to electrolux trilobite 1.0 trilobite 2.0 Future Tech Gadget Gift geek cool gadget Product Technology Future Cool smallest, Buy Gift Sale Electronics device camera player new gadget future gadget Future Technology News technology Review Trilobite 1.0
Why the Trilobite is expensive:

Brian Summers writes:
For background reference, I have a degree in Computer Science specializing in human computer interaction and artificial intelligence and I have designed and built several autonomous and pseudo-autonomous robots.

The main difference in price most likely has to do with the different sensors and mapping techniques that the robots implement. Truth be told the Roomba is really a "dumb" robot which only reacts to situations (i.e. when it bumps into something or detects a IR beam). It will then just randomly turn in another direction. Now given enough time, it will eventually travel over and clean a portion of the room it is in, but it will probably not get everything (given an infinite amount of time it should, but it doesn't have an infinite battery life to do this). This type of design is very simple and easy to make. Bump and IR sensors cost less then $1, and there really is not much processing required, just a simple random number generator to pick a number against a table of different commands (each command most likely being turn right for x amount of time, or turn left for x amount of time). This type of processing can also be created very cheaply, probably under $10 in parts and construction. So in the Roomba's case you are paying for a $180 cord-less vacuum with about $20 worth of "smarts" to it.

The Trilobite is using a version of radar to actually create a map of its environment. It then uses this map to plot where it currently is located and where it has been in the past. It can use this information to figure out a way to travel efficiently around the entire room and cover all the places that it can get to given its size limitations. I've designed similar robots myself, the purpose of those robots was to be able to tell the robot a destination and have it figure out a way to get there without running into obstacles in its way. This type of system requires a processor and memory to handle the style of programming needed to do these functions. A real-time planning and event based operating programming is used to instruct the robot what to do. It first will take sensor sweeps with its radar/sonar and create a map of the area around it. This map is used to mark obstacles that it detects with the sensors as well as mark where the robot is currently located and where it

was in the past. Rudimentary versions can be built using a processor, memory, and the sensors. In addition to having the bump sensors which I have discussed above, the sonic sensors are a little more complicated. A cheap version can be done by using Polaroid sonar distance sensors (these where created by Polaroid for their camera's to help in auto-focusing by calculating a more precise distance to the target). Even these sensors are not very cheap (around $30). And they have an audible clicking sound as the frequency of the wave is within the human hearing range. The Trilobite is using sensors outside the audible spectrum which will also allow them to be more accurate as background interference will be reduced because it is less likely that there will be other devices creating waves in that same frequency range as the device. This type of mapping will also need to handle "echoes" (reception of the burst from another location at a longer delay then the initial reflection of a

n object would create, thus making it believe that there is an object farther away in the distance when there may be nothing there at all). Echoes are not the only obstacle that needs to be addressed. Room reflections, corner blindness conditions, and close wall blindness are all other obstacles that need to be accounted for.

Take this situation, the sonar/radar is aimed at the corner of a box. The reflection from the box will not be detected because the beam will reflect off the box at a side angle and never return to the robot. The robot would never see the box and thus be blind to it (this is part of the reason why the stealth fighter has such a small radar image, because of all the angles on the plane, the radar beam is reflected away from the plane, but not back at the radar source, thus the radar does not detect it).

Creating a program to properly handle all of these problems correctly is very time consuming and difficult (if it was simple, we would all own cars that drive themselves). It is not 100% correct all the time and it will still have some problems detecting objects with sonar/radar, but the Trilobite will be able to know that it has traveled across all the areas it needs to clean.

The full processing power and sensor network needed to create a decent mapping system will cost around $80 with just one sonar/radar sensor. With more sensors, the price will jump about $30 per sensor until it reaches a point where a more powerful processor is required to interpret all the data being sent by the sensors. I do not have the exact specs on the Trilobite, but let us assume it uses between 2-4 sensors so that will cost around $120-200 in parts alone. Factor in the cost for programmers to develop the software to run the robot and there is probably another $200 per robot in cost. So you are looking at about 20x in price of smarts put into the Trilobite as there are in the Roomba.

Does this justify the almost 20x total cost? I don't know, as I don't own either. But at least it gives the reason for the price difference. Would you rather own a robot which will most likely be able to completely sweep your room and be able to return to its docking station, or a robot which may or may not be able to clean your room, but will probably get to a large portion of it before running out of power? Now that is the question that you need to answer.

Gordon Dowell writes:
I think the Trilobite knows where it has hovered where as the Roomba just goes about for long enough to have reasonably covered the whole floor all be it in some parts several times over. Knowing where you've been probably takes allot more computing power. Also the Roomba is made by a toy manufacturer everything is screwed down to a tight budget. I'd by the Roomba 2 that knows where it's been saving power and looks a bit slicker for $300.


Tom writes:
I used to have a Roomba. The Roomba gets stuck on rug fringes and has trouble with carpeting. It gets entangled in cables and cords. It also doesn't have much power. If the Electrolux doesn't have those problems, it may be worth the price.


Buy the Electrolux Trilobite® High Performance Robotic Vac at Hammacher Schlemmer for $1,799.95.



 

iPad Air Giveaway. Win a free iPad Air.

You Might Also Like

Updates


Sponsored Update

Update: 10

GLCs told to provide RM7 billion to develop Bumiputera firms

Source: Malaysia Today

EurAsia Cup presented by DRB-HICOM - Day One
(The Malaysian Insider) – Putrajaya has directed government-linked companies (GLC) to generate RM7 billion in business opportunities for Bumiputera firms this year, Prime Minister Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today 5 days ago, 2:05am CDT
 


Advertisement


Update: 9

Rafizi shows proof of Putrajaya’s hand in contentious carpet-trader loan

Source: Malaysia Today

Eileen Ng, The Malaysian Insider PKR lawmaker Rafizi Ramli today revealed documents to prove Putrajaya interfered in the RM32 million Bank Rakyat loan to ‎controversial businessman Deepak Jaikishan ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today 6 days ago, 2:16am CDT
 

More From the Web

Update: 8

PAS MP claims Bank Rakyat loaned carpet-trader RM215m, interest free

Source: Malaysia Today

(Malay Mail Online) – Controversial businessman Deepak Jaikishan (pic) was given a whopping RM215 million interest-free loan from state-owned Bank Rakyat, a PAS lawmaker alleged today, despite ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today Jul 14 2014, 5:52am CDT
 

Update: 7

MRCB, Nusa Gapurna and PKNS settle suit over RM3 billion PJ Sentral project

Source: Malaysia Today

(The Malaysian Insider) – Malaysian Resources Corp Bhd (MRCB), Nusa Gapurna Development Sdn Bhd (NGD) and PKNS Holdings Sdn Bhd have reached an out-of-court settlement over the owner ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today Jun 21 2014, 2:53am CDT
 

Update: 6

Story behind Syed Mokhtar’s ‘RM2.25 billion tax-exempt’ Bernas deal revealed, says PKR MP

Source: Malaysia Today

(The Malaysian Insider) – An innocuous written reply in Parliament has provided a peek into the cosy relationship between the Najib administration and Malaysia’s best-known businessman, ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today Jun 15 2014, 12:56pm CDT
 

Update: 5

Constitutional monarchy still murky concept

Source: Malaysia Today

After the RM4.5 billion land sale, the Sultan of Johor secured a 15% stake in MOL Access Portal (MOL) for RM396 million and took a 20% stake in Berjaya Times ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today Jun 14 2014, 12:37am CDT
 

Update: 4

Sultan of Johor’s RM4.5 bil backlash?

Source: Malaysia Today

"GOLDEN ASIA" Tokyo Premiere Press Conference
Has Sultan Ibrahim of Johor’s succession of big money deals over the last six months caused the tide of public opinion to turn against Johor’s royal palace? KiniBiz examines the... READ M ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today Jun 11 2014, 8:49am CDT
 

Update: 3

Putrajaya denies carpet dealer given interest-free loan

Source: Malaysia Today

Eileen Ng, The Malaysian Insider Putrajaya today refuted allegations that Bank Rakyat had allowed carpet dealer Deepak Jaikishan to repay a RM32 million loan without interest ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today Jun 11 2014, 5:44am CDT
 

Update: 2

Malaysia Spends Over $9 million on MH370 Hunt: Report

Source: NDTV

"GOLDEN ASIA" Tokyo Premiere Press Conference
Malaysia has so far spent about RM27.6 million (over $9 million) on search operations for missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370, an official sai ...
Source: NDTV   Full article at: NDTV Jun 9 2014, 3:12am CDT
 

Update: 1

Bill for Kidex likely to soar to RM3.4b

Source: Malaysia Today

The original RM2.4 billion tag on the proposed highway did not take into account the cost of acquiring the land mostly in the urban areas, claims an assemblywoman Fabian Comelius, ...
Source: Malaysia Today   Full article at: Malaysia Today Jun 9 2014, 2:51am CDT
 

Shopping Deals

 
 
 

<a href="/latest_stories/all/all/2" rel="author">Luigi Lugmayr</a>
Luigi Lugmayr (Google) is the founding chief Editor of I4U News and brings over 15 years experience in the technology field to the ever evolving and exciting world of gadgets. He started I4U News back in 2000 and evolved it into vibrant technology magazine.
Luigi can be contacted directly at ml@i4u.com.

 

 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

Latest stories

George Clooney Worries About Daily Mail &#039;Bleeding Into American Press&#039;
George Clooney Worries About Daily Mail 'Bleeding Into American Press'
George Clooney gave an interview on Friday to Variety, opening up about his problems with the Daily Mail and why he's worried about journalism.
 
 
iPad Mini Air to be 30% Thinner
iPad Mini Air to be 30% Thinner
Apple's tablet shipments for year 2014 will be roughly the same as last year
 
 
Pamela Anderson Turning To Her Sons During Relationship Drama
Pamela Anderson Turning To Her Sons During Relationship Drama
The former Baywatch star has always been devoted to her sons Brandon, 18, and Dylan, 16, by ex Tommy Lee.
 
 
Helle Berry&#039;s role in Monster&#039;s Ball was first offered to Vanessa Williams
Helle Berry's role in Monster's Ball was first offered to Vanessa Williams
Though Vanessa gave up on a role that won Helle Berry the Oscar for the best actress, she still has no regrets
 
 
 

About the Geek Mind


Read more about The Geek Mind.