Spammers On Storm Botnet Make $3.5 Million Per Year

Posted: Nov 11 2008, 6:28am CST | by , Updated: Aug 11 2010, 11:34am CDT, in News | Other Stuff

/* Story Top Left 2010 300x250, created 7/15/10 */ google_ad_slot = "8340327155";

Buy This Now On Amazon

Researchers conducted a study into spam to find out how profitable it was and how high the response rate to spam messages was. To do so the researchers hijacked a portion of the Storm botnet that had over 1 million machines in use to send out spam.

The research team used 75,869 machines to send their own fake emails trying to sell medications like Viagra. People who clicked on the buy button were greeted with an error message. Out of a claimed 469 million spam messages sent the response rate was 0.00001%.

One researcher wrote that after 26 days and 350 million e-mail messages only 28 sales resulted. Still a real spammer would have had revenues over the month of $2,731.88. At an estimated $80 per million messages, the spammers are earning about $7,000 per day with revenues of around $3.5 million.

Via PC Pro

Holiday Gift Guides and Deals

Get your Holiday gifting inspired by Best Toy Gifts with High STEM Value and the Top 10 toy gifts under $10 if you are on budget. The most popular Holiday 2017 toy list include Fingerlings, Crate Creatures and more. Don't miss the new Holiday deals on Amazon Devices, including $29.99 Fire tablet.

This story may contain affiliate links.

This free App Solves You Holiday Shopping Problem

Download the free Tracker app now to get in-stock alerts on Fingerling, Luvabella, SNES Classic and more.

Latest News


The Author

<a href="/latest_stories/all/all/3" rel="author">Shane McGlaun</a>
Tech and Car expert Shane McGlaun (Google) reports about what's new in these two sectors. His extensive experience in testing cars, computer hardware and consumer electronics enable him to effectively qualify new products and trends. If you want us review your product, please contact Shane.
Shane can be contacted directly at




comments powered by Disqus