AdMob Study Shows QWERTY As Android's Future

Posted: Apr 27 2010, 11:38am CDT | by , Updated: Aug 11 2010, 8:49pm CDT, in News | Technology News

/* Story Top Left 2010 300x250, created 7/15/10 */ google_ad_slot = "8340327155";

Buy This Now On Amazon

AdMob's latest numbers are out. Among other things, they showed that 11 of the 34 Android devices available accounted for 96% of the traffic on all Android devices. Motorola and HTC are the leading Android manufacturers, with 44% and 43% of the total Android traffic, respectively.

It shouldn't be surprising that the Droid was the most successful handset in terms of browsing. It generated 32% of Android traffic over this period. What IS surprising, is that a whopping 54% of Android traffic came from QWERTY keyboard packing devices. A substantial majority of Android handsets lack keyboards, yet they are responsible for a disproportionate amount of the browsing done over Android OS.

This seems to say one of two things. Either heavy-browsers are drawn to phones with a sliding QWERTY keyboard, or that sort of form-factor simply drives users to use their phones more often. Either way, the implications of this news to manufacturers is huge.

I started my Android experience with a T-Mobile G1. Now I use a Nexus One. Despite the latter's greatly improved speed and gorgeous screen, I did a lot more free-range browsing (and chatting) on my G1. Apparently this trend goes beyond just me.

This story may contain affiliate links.


Find rare products online! Get the free Tracker App now.

Download the free Tracker app now to get in-stock alerts on Pomsies, Oculus Go, SNES Classic and more.

Latest News


The Author

<a href="/latest_stories/all/all/5" rel="author">Robert Evans</a>
The excitement about new smartphones, tablets and anything mobile drive Robert to unearth the latest rumors and developments in this fast moving space. He adopted 4G as soon as it become available and knows where the mobile market is going.
Robert can be contacted directly at




comments powered by Disqus