The legal problem with running a daily fantasy football contest on Super Bowl Sunday stems from the unique nature of the ‘fantasy sports carve-out’ to the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006.
The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (“UIGEA”) makes it illegal for any company “engaged in the business of betting or wagering” to “knowingly accept” funds “in connection with the participation of another person in unlawful Internet gambling.”
(I) All prizes and awards offered to winning participants are established and made known to the participants in advance of the game or contest and their value is not determined by the number of participants or the amount of any fees paid by those participants.
(II) All winning outcomes reflect the relative knowledge and skill of the participants and are determined predominantly by accumulated statistical results of the performance of individuals (athletes in the case of sports events) in multiple real-world sporting or other events.
(III) No winning outcome is based—
(bb) solely on any single performance of an individual athlete in any single real-world sporting or other event.
Because the NFL only plays one game on Super Bowl Sunday (that, of course, being the Super Bowl), any daily fantasy football contest held on that Super Bowl Sunday would fail the second prong of this carve-out because the contest would not be based on “multiple real-world” events.
Marc Edelman is an Associate Professor of Law at the City University of New York’s Baruch College, Zicklin School of Business, where he has published more than 25 law review articles on sports law matters, including “A Short Treatise on Fantasy Sports and the Law.”
In addition, he is an adjunct professor at Fordham Law School, and a legal consultant on sports, antitrust, gaming and intellectual property matters. Nothing contained in this article should be construed as legal advice.
Follow me on Twitter here