Filed under: Reviews | Computer Hardware
Mar 27 2008, 12:00am CDT | by Shane McGlaun
We have so far looked at two different NVIDIA 9800 GX2 video cards. Today we are going to take a look at a pair of the cards in Quad SLI mode. NVIDIA tried Quad SLI before with the 7950 GX2 and things didn’t work so well. Today we will find out if quad SLI with the 9800 GX2 is better. Read on for all the details.
Features & Specifications
I won’t go into the features of the two cards I am using today since they have both already been reviewed. I will be using the PNY 9800 GX2 and the XFX 9800 GX2 for this review.
Test Machine
The test machine I am using has the following specs:
3DMark06
The first test up for quad SLI is 3Dmark06. As you will see a pair of 9800 GX2’s doesn’t really do anything for performance in this synthetic benchmark. The pair of 9800 GX2 cards in quad SLI scored as follows in 3DMark06:
To compare the PNY 9800 GX2 I reviewed this week scored 16583 3DMarks and the XFX 9800 GX2 I reviewed last week scored 16227 (on a different test machine).
Crysis
The next test up was Crysis. I ran the game at 1920 x 1200 with 2X AA and all settings on high but motion blur which was set to medium and objects quality that was set to very high. I used Fraps to record frame rate data from the initial beach insertion till the combat with the first enemy soldiers. Fraps recorded the following frame rate data:
The single PNY 9800 GX2 I tested had an average frame rate with the same settings of only 28.32 fps. That is a huge frame rate increase and the game much more playable.
Bioshock
Next up was Bioshock which I ran at 2560 x 1600 with all settings on high and everything turned on. I used Fraps to record frame rate data while playing and got the following data:
That is a much higher minimum frame rate than a single 9800 GX2 could muster at 15 fps. However, Bioshock didn’t benefit as much from Quad SLI as Crysis did and the quad SLI system actually showed a lower average frame rate than the single GX2.
Quake Wars
The final game test was Quake Wars, which I ran at 2560 x 1600 with all settings on high, ultra shaders, 32x AA and 2X AF. Fraps recorded the following frame rate data on a single player map called Africa refinery.
Final Thoughts
In all whether or not quad SLI would benefit you depends on what you want to do. If Crysis is your game, then Quad SLI is just what you need to get playable frame rates at very high settings. However if benchmarks are what you want to run Quad SLI might not be for you.
Pros
Cons
Verdict
In the end quad SLI does work and performs well on some games like Crysis. As with any high-end product it costs a lot and that will keep quad SLI out of the hands of most gamers. The cards along in this test are around $1200 for the pair. You can build a nice mid-range gaming system for that much.
Source: this WEEK in TECH
AMD nat making "Needlessly Powerful CPUs",I ntel's Going Green, XFX the kings of the midrange GPU, Unreal 4 screenshots, and more. Googarola is a done deal, Chameleon takes to Kickstarter, Google+ gets major u ...
Full article at: this WEEK in TECH
More like this 2 hours ago, 5:35pm CDT
Source: Coding Horror
I didn't intend for Please Don't Learn to Code to be so controversial, but it seemed to strike a nerve. Apparently a significant percentage of readers stopped reading at the title. So I will open with my o ...
Full article at: Coding Horror
More like this 3 hours ago, 5:01pm CDT
Source: Business Wire
TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Ideaca, a Canadian based consulting firm that helps customers through a portfolio of management consulting, advisory, implementation and support services, has been recognized as one of Canada’s top 100 Solution Provi ...
Full article at: Business Wire
More like this 10 hours ago, 9:28am CDT
Shane McGlaun
Leading our review center, Shane knows technology inside out. His
extensive experience in testing computer hardware and consumer
electronics enable him to effectively qualify new products and trends. If you want us review your product, please contact Shane.
Shane can be contacted directly at shane@i4u.com.
blog comments powered by Disqus